AI Compliance: Navigating Challenges in 2025

Artificial intelligence is no longer a futuristic concept—it’s reshaping business, governance, and daily life at breakneck speed. Yet, with this rapid innovation comes a host of regulatory headaches, especially in the domains of compliance and data sovereignty. In 2025, as organizations race to integrate AI into everything from customer service to critical infrastructure, the gap between technological advancement and regulatory oversight has never felt wider. Enter Avani Desai, CEO of Schellman, a leading authority on compliance and cybersecurity, who’s spent a quarter-century navigating the evolving landscape of tech regulation. Speaking candidly about the current state of affairs, Desai sums it up: “AI has introduced the most urgent governance questions to date. Our pace of innovation is a lot faster than the pace of regulation right now.”[1]

But what does this mean for enterprises scrambling to stay ahead—and stay compliant? Let’s unpack the challenges, opportunities, and strategies shaping compliance in the AI and data sovereignty era.

The AI Compliance Landscape: A Perfect Storm

The adoption of artificial intelligence across industries has been nothing short of explosive. Organizations are leveraging AI for everything from predictive analytics to automated customer interactions, but with this surge comes a flood of new risks and regulatory demands. As Desai points out, the frenzy to adopt AI often outpaces the careful consideration of its implications—especially when it comes to privacy, security, and ethical use[1][4].

Consider this: AI systems require massive datasets to train and operate effectively. Where does this data come from? Who owns it? What happens when sensitive or personal information is involved? These questions are at the heart of the data sovereignty debate, especially as countries and regions enact stricter data localization and privacy laws. The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act, passed in 2024, is a prime example of regulatory efforts to keep pace with technology—though, as Desai notes, it’s often a step behind the latest developments[1][4].

Four Critical AI Risks Every Organization Must Address

According to Schellman’s CEO, there are four primary categories of risk that organizations must proactively manage when integrating AI:

• Bias: AI models can inadvertently reinforce or amplify existing biases in data, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes.
• Data Provenance: Understanding where data comes from, how it’s collected, and who has access to it is crucial for compliance and trust.
• Model Drift: Over time, AI models can become less accurate as real-world conditions change, potentially leading to flawed decision-making.
• Explainability: Regulators and stakeholders increasingly demand transparency in how AI systems reach their conclusions[1].

These risks aren’t just theoretical. Real-world examples abound, from AI-powered hiring tools that discriminate against certain demographics to chatbots that generate misleading or false information—so-called “AI hallucinations”[5].

Regulatory Frameworks: Playing Catch-Up

In the absence of comprehensive global standards, organizations are turning to emerging frameworks like ISO 42001, which provides guidelines for secure and responsible AI adoption. Schellman, notably, was the first ANAB-accredited certification body for ISO 42001, helping clients establish, implement, and continuously improve their AI management systems[1][4].

But even these frameworks have limitations. “Most regulations today don’t address agentic AI, because it’s come to market so quickly,” Desai observes. Agentic AI—systems that can autonomously make decisions or take actions—presents a new frontier for compliance, with implications that regulators are only beginning to grapple with[1].

Meanwhile, the EU’s NIS 2 Directive, which member states must transpose into national law by October 2024, adds another layer of complexity. Organizations under its scope face significant fines for non-compliance, underscoring the need for robust cybersecurity measures in the age of AI[5].

The Global Patchwork: Data Sovereignty and Local Regulations

Data sovereignty—the principle that data is subject to the laws of the country in which it is collected—has become a flashpoint in global compliance. Countries like China, Russia, and the EU have enacted strict data localization laws, requiring organizations to store and process data within their borders. For multinational companies, this creates a labyrinth of overlapping and sometimes conflicting regulations.

The United States, under President Biden’s recent executive order, is also stepping up efforts to manage AI risks while promoting innovation. The order aims to position the U.S. as a global leader in AI, but it also introduces new compliance obligations for organizations operating in the country[5].

Real-World Applications and Industry Impact

The challenges of AI compliance and data sovereignty aren’t confined to tech firms. Industries as diverse as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing are grappling with these issues. For example:

• Healthcare: AI-powered diagnostic tools must comply with strict privacy laws like HIPAA in the U.S. and GDPR in the EU.
• Finance: Banks using AI for fraud detection or credit scoring face scrutiny over fairness, transparency, and data security.
• Manufacturing: AI-driven predictive maintenance systems must ensure data integrity and comply with industry-specific regulations.

Across sectors, organizations are under pressure to demonstrate that their AI systems are secure, trustworthy, and responsible. Aligning with established frameworks and standards—such as ISO 42001 and HITRUST—has become essential for maintaining credibility and mitigating risk[4].

Events and Thought Leadership

The conversation around AI compliance is heating up at industry events. SchellmanCon 2025, for instance, brings together compliance experts, cybersecurity professionals, and business leaders to share insights and best practices for navigating this complex landscape[2]. Similarly, the “Compliance in the Age of AI 2025” conference in San Francisco delves into the profound ways AI is revolutionizing compliance frameworks—presenting both opportunities and challenges for organizations worldwide[3].

Comparing Key AI Compliance Frameworks

To help organizations make sense of the regulatory landscape, here’s a comparison of some of the most influential frameworks and standards:

The Road Ahead: Preparing for the Future

So, what should organizations do to stay ahead of the curve? Desai’s advice is clear: “We advise our clients to get onboard with AI governance programs now. What is encouraged today will almost certainly be required tomorrow, and organizations need to prepare for that reality.”[1]

This means:

• Proactively assessing AI risks across the four key categories outlined by Schellman.
• Aligning with emerging standards like ISO 42001 and ensuring robust data governance.
• Staying informed about regulatory developments and participating in industry discussions.
• Investing in compliance training and expertise to navigate the evolving landscape.

As someone who’s followed AI for years, I can’t help but marvel at how quickly the ground is shifting. The days of treating compliance as an afterthought are over. In the AI era, it’s a core business imperative—one that demands attention, investment, and, yes, a bit of humility.

Conclusion: Compliance as Competitive Advantage

Let’s face it: the regulatory environment for AI is only going to get more complex. Organizations that embrace proactive compliance and robust governance frameworks will not only avoid costly penalties but also build trust with customers, partners, and regulators. The stakes are high, but so are the rewards for those who get it right.

As Schellman’s Avani Desai puts it, “What is encouraged today will almost certainly be required tomorrow.” Now is the time for organizations to act—before the next wave of regulation catches them off guard[1].

**