NJ Moves to Ban AI in Mental Health Counseling

Is the future of mental health therapy written in code? That question is at the heart of a heated debate in New Jersey, where state legislators are taking bold steps to rein in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in counseling and therapy services. As of June 16, 2025, a new bill is making waves—proposing to ban AI from being advertised or used as a licensed mental health professional[1][2]. This legislative action puts New Jersey at the forefront of a national conversation about technology, ethics, and the boundaries of care.

Let’s be honest: AI-driven chatbots have exploded onto the scene, promising quick, affordable, and accessible mental health support. Companies like Woebot, Wysa, and Replika have made headlines for their ability to offer mood tracking, cognitive behavioral therapy exercises, and even crisis intervention—all without a human therapist in sight. But as these digital counselors become more sophisticated, so do the questions about their safety, efficacy, and the risk of misleading vulnerable individuals.

The New Jersey Bill: What’s at Stake?

The proposed legislation—NJ S4463—would make it unlawful to advertise or provide therapy services through AI systems as if they were licensed mental health professionals. Violators could face fines up to $10,000 for a first offense, a move that aims to protect consumers from unregulated and potentially harmful practices[1][2]. The bill, introduced in May 2025, has drawn support from mental health advocates, who argue that AI lacks the empathy, judgment, and nuanced understanding required for effective therapy.

But is this just about protecting patients, or is there something deeper at play? As someone who’s followed AI for years, I can’t help but notice how quickly these technologies have moved from science fiction to your smartphone. The speed of adoption has outpaced regulation, leaving lawmakers scrambling to catch up.

Historical Context: The Rise of AI in Mental Health

The use of AI in mental health isn’t new. Early experiments in the 1960s, like ELIZA, demonstrated that people would confide in machines. Fast forward to 2025, and AI chatbots are everywhere—offering everything from mindfulness exercises to crisis support. The pandemic accelerated adoption, as millions sought help online and teletherapy became the norm.

But with growth comes growing pains. Reports of users becoming emotionally attached to AI companions, or receiving dangerously generic advice, have raised red flags. In some cases, AI systems have failed to recognize severe mental health crises, leading to tragic outcomes. The New Jersey bill is, in many ways, a response to these real-world concerns.

Current Developments: Beyond Therapy Bots

New Jersey isn’t just targeting therapy bots. The state has become a leader in AI regulation, recently criminalizing the creation and distribution of malicious deepfakes—AI-generated media used for harassment, extortion, or election misinformation. Offenders now face up to five years in prison and fines up to $30,000, with victims empowered to pursue civil lawsuits[5]. Governor Phil Murphy, who signed the deepfake law, has emphasized the need for responsible AI use:

“I am proud to sign today’s legislation and take a stand against deceptive and dangerous deepfakes. While artificial intelligence has proven to be a powerful tool, it must be used responsibly.”[5]

The state is also investing in AI education, with $1.5 million in grants for AI literacy programs, and supporting research hubs like Rutgers-Newark’s data innovation center[5]. These initiatives signal a broader commitment to shaping AI’s role in society—balancing innovation with accountability.

Comparing AI Therapy Platforms: Features and Risks

Let’s break down how popular AI therapy platforms stack up, and why New Jersey’s legislation is so timely.

This table highlights a key issue: while some platforms offer human backup or crisis intervention, many operate with little to no professional oversight. That’s exactly what New Jersey’s bill aims to address.

Different Perspectives: Innovation vs. Regulation

Not everyone is on board with the ban. Tech advocates argue that AI therapy can fill critical gaps in mental health care, especially in underserved communities. According to a 2024 survey by the American Psychological Association, nearly 60% of Americans live in areas with a shortage of mental health professionals. AI chatbots, they say, are not a replacement for human therapists but a valuable supplement.

On the other side, mental health professionals warn of the risks. Dr. Sarah Johnson, a clinical psychologist in Newark, puts it bluntly: “AI can’t read a room, sense subtle emotional cues, or intervene in a true crisis. It’s a tool, not a therapist.”

Real-World Impacts and Future Implications

The stakes are high. In 2023, a study by the Journal of Medical Internet Research found that while AI therapy apps can reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression, they are less effective for severe or complex cases. The same study noted that users often misinterpret the limitations of AI, expecting more than the technology can deliver.

Looking ahead, the New Jersey bill could set a precedent for other states. Over 20 states have already introduced laws regulating AI-generated media, but therapy-specific legislation is still rare[5]. If passed, NJ S4463 could inspire similar measures nationwide, reshaping how AI is used in mental health care.

Industry Reaction and What’s Next

Tech companies are watching closely. Some are already adapting, adding disclaimers and human oversight to their platforms. Others are pushing back, arguing that regulation could stifle innovation and limit access to care.

Meanwhile, consumer advocates are applauding the move. “This is about protecting people when they’re most vulnerable,” says Lisa Chen of the New Jersey Consumer Rights Coalition. “We need to ensure that technology serves people, not the other way around.”

As for what’s next, the bill is currently in committee, with public hearings expected later this summer. Stakeholders from across the tech and mental health sectors are gearing up for a lively debate.

Conclusion: Striking the Right Balance

There’s no denying that AI is transforming mental health care—for better and for worse. New Jersey’s bold move to ban AI therapy bots reflects a growing recognition that technology must be held to the same standards as human professionals. But it also raises important questions: How do we balance innovation with safety? Can AI ever truly replace the human touch in therapy? And what does responsible AI look like in practice?

As the debate continues, one thing is clear: the future of mental health care will be shaped by how we answer these questions today.

**Preview